Psychoanalytical Deconstruction of Liberalism


Abstract views: 125 / PDF downloads: 81

Authors

  • Efe BAŞTÜRK Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü, RİZE,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7419593

Keywords:

Deconstruction, Psychoanalyses, Subject, Liberalism

Abstract

Deconstruction is a method adopted in Derrida philosophy to emphasize the state of dualities. According to deconstruction, the construction hides and keeps the dualities that create itself in order to present itself as a stable whole. The purpose of the deconstruction is to reveal the immanent instability of the construction, thus to unveil the hidden relation within in the construction. This methodical view of the deconstruction is compatible with the philosophy of psychoanalysis. As a philosophy, psychoanalysis emphasizes the incompleteness of Self-ideal and considers that what constitutes the construction of Self is not the self-conscious, but the unconscious that surrounds the conscious from somewhere uncertain. Psychoanalysis and deconstruction try to resolve the fact that unities, which are considered consistent and stable, is actually fragile. The aim of this essay is to discuss the instability and arbitrariness of the coherence attributed to the Self-ideal in the ideology of liberalism and to the market society in which Self-ideal is situated as a subject, by identifying commonalities in the philosophies of deconstruction and psychoanalysis. Liberalism affirms and normalizes market society by depending upon the coherence and integrity of subject of Self which is rational, autonomous and constitutes on the basis of egoism. This process of normalization is constantly being filled with efforts to preserve the intrinsic contradictions in the subject and in the market society in which the subject is effective. In this context, the fictive Self reaches to the self-cognition by positioning itself within the discourse of the Subject which is assumed as the immanence part of the capitalistic relationships. However, since the capitalist relations correspond to fictional contexts, the Subject, which is located within these relations, is itself transformed into the emptysignifier. So, the capitalistic relations derive its meaning from the empty-signifiers which liberalism imposes on the “Self” ideal. Capitalism hides its instability through producing “fictive reality” and “fictive Self” in which the concrete social reality cannot be noticed. In this study, the instability of the structure of the subject-centered is tried to be demonstrated with the psychoanalytical deconstruction. The purpose of bringing deconstruction and psychoanalyses together is to reveal the fictive production of both subject-centered social relations and the subject itself which is assumed as the central figure in these relationships. In other words, the psychoanalytical deconstruction focuses on revealing the invisibility of the discursive-structural instability ascribed to the subject.

References

Althusser, L. (der) (2017). Kapital’i Okumak, çev. Işık Ergüden, İstanbul: Nora

Bowie, M. (2007). Lacan, (V. Pekel Şener, çev.), Ankara: Dost

Cumming, R. D. (1969). Human Nature and History: A Study of the Development of Liberal Political Thought Vol. 1, Chicago:

University of Chicago Press

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Differance, (Alan Bass: Çev.) London: The University of Chicago Press,

Derrida, J. (1982a). Positions, (Alan Bass: Çev.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Derrida, J. (1982b). Margins of Philosophy, (Alan Bass: Çev.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Derrida, J. (1992a). Points… Interviews, 1974-1994. Elisabeth Weber (ed), (Peggy Kamuf: Çev.). California: University of

Stanford Press

Derrida, J. (1992b). Acts of Literature, Derek Attridge (ed), New York: Routledge

Doyon, M. (2014). “The Transcendental Claim of Deconstruction”, A Companion to Derrida, Zeynep Direk ve Leonard Lawlor

(ed), Oxford: Wiley Blackwell Pub., ss. 132-150

Homer, S. (2013). Jacques Lacan, (Abdurrahman Aydın: Çev.), Ankara: Phoenix

Koch, A. M. (2007). Poststructuralism and the Politics of Method, New York: Lexington Books

Lacan, J. (2007). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Other Side of Psychoanalyses (Book XVII), (Russell Grigg: çev.), New

York: W. W. Norton Company

Lacan, J. (2011). “Özne-Ben’in İşlevinin Oluşturucusu Olarak Ayna Evresi”, (Nilüfer Kuyaş: çev.), S. Zizek (der), İdeolojiyi

Haritalamak, Ankara: Dipnot

Lacan, J. (2013). Psikanalizin Dört Temel Kavramı: Seminer 11. Kitap, (Nilüfer Erdem: Çev.), İstanbul: Metis

Manent, P. (1996). An Intellectual History of Liberalism, (Rebeca Balinski, çev.), New Jersey: Princeton University Press

Marx, K. (2011). Kapital: Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisi Cilt 1, (Mehmet Selik ve Nail Satlıgan: çev.), İstanbul: Yordam

Marx, K. ve Engels, F. (2013). Alman İdeolojisi, (Tonguç Ok ve Olcay Geridönmez: çev.), İstanbul: Evrensel Basım

Rabate, J. M. (2003). “Lacan’s turn to Freud”, J. M. Rabate (der), The Cambridge Companion To Lacan, Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, ss. 1-24

Read, J. (2014). Sermayenin Mikropolitikası: Şimdiki Zamanın Tarihöncesi ve Marx, (Ayşe Deniz Temiz: çev.), İstanbul: Metis

Roudinesco, E. (1990). Jacques Lacan & Co: A History of Psychoanalyses in France, 1925-1985, (Jeffrey Mehlman: Çev.),

Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Roudinesco, E. (2012). Her Şeye ve Herkese Karşı Lacan, (Nami Başer: çev.), İstanbul: Metis

Rutli, E. E. (2016). “Derrida’nınYapısökümü”, Temaşa, sayı:5, ss. 49-69

Sallis, J. (1987). Deconstruction and Philosophy: The Texts of Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in General Linguistics, (Wade Baskin, çev.), New York: The Philosophical Library Press

Smith, A. (1997). “The Four Stages of Society”, A. Broadie (der), The Scottish Enlightenment: An Antology, Edinburgh:

Canongate

Smith, G. H. (2013). The System of Liberty: Themes in the History of Classical Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press

Tomsiç, S. (2017). Kapitalist Bilinçdışı: Marx Ve Lacan, (Barış Engin Aksoy: çev.), İstanbul: Metis

Tura, S. M. (1996). Freud’dan Lacan’a Psikanaliz, İstanbul: Ayrıntı

Vighi, F. (2010). On Zizek’s Dialectics: Surplus, Subtraction, Sublimation. New York: Continuum

Zizek, S. (2011). İdeolojinin Yüce Nesnesi, (Tuncay Birkan: çev.), İstanbul: Metis

Zupancic, A. (2011). Neden Psikanaliz? Üç Müdahale, (Barış Engin Aksoy: çev.), İstanbul: Metis

Published

2018-07-19

How to Cite

BAŞTÜRK, E. (2018). Psychoanalytical Deconstruction of Liberalism. POSSEIBLE, (13), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7419593

Issue

Section

Articles