Precarious Canopy of The Sacred: According To Peter Berger, The Meaning Of Belief In The Age Of Pluralism
Abstract views: 56
/ 
PDF downloads: 42
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7419748Keywords:
The experience of religion, multiple choice, relativism, fundamentalism, bad faithAbstract
Pluralism is the most important feature that distinguishes modern society from pre-modern societies. The structure of preferences in the competion replace religious symbolical universe which unifies and integrates differances. In this structure, what is the religion of the future is the topic of the sociological debates. In this study, we will discuss the views of Peter L. Berger, who is one of the leading sociologists of contemporary sociology, about pluralism and religious reality. Firstly, we’ll investigate the passage of construction of social world from a taken for granted reality to individual decision-making process. Secondly, we will focus on the notion of denomination as a form of organization developed to survive in the multiple choice regime of the market system. Thirdly in the context of Berger’s late works, we’ll try to find out reproduction of religion as a thinking style on the axis of two opposing concepts: fundamentalism and relativism. Lastly, we’ll interpret Berger’s claim in Precarious Vision that the religion is not a founder of social discourse but is constructed by social discourse.
References
Balcı, M. E. (2012). Peter Berger’in Din ve Bilgi Sosyolojisi Anlayışı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, İÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
(Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi),
Berger, P.L. (1963). “A Market Model for the Analysis of Ecumenicity”, Social Research, Bahar, 77-93
Berger, P. L (1961) Precarios Vision: A Sociologist Looks at Social Fictions and Christian Faith, New York, Doubleday
ve Company,
Berger, P. L. (1967). A Sociological View of The Secularization of Theology, Journal for The Scientific Study of Religion,
Sayı:6, Cilt:1, Bahar, 3-16
Berger, P. L. (2003). “Orthodox and Pluralistic Challenge”, Greek Orthodox Theological Review Sayı:48, Bahar, 33-42
Berger, P. L. (2005). Kutsal Şemsiye, terc. Ali Coşkun, İstanbul: Rağbet Yayınları
Berger, P. L. , Woodhead, L. ,Heelas, P. ve Martin D. (ed) (2001). “Postcript”, Peter Berger and The Study of Religion,
London, Routledge, 189-198
Berger, P. L. (1981). “The Pluralistic Situation and The Coming Dialogue Between World Religions”, Buddhist-Christian
Studies, Vol: 1, 31- 41
Berger, P. L. ve Zijderveld , A.C. (2009). In Praise of Doubt: How to Have Convictions Without Becoming a Fanatic,
y.y, HarperCollins e-books,
Berger, P. L. ve Luckmanni T. (1995). Modernity, Pluralism and The Crisis of Meaning: Orientation of Modern Man,
Gütersloh, Bertelsmant Foundation Publishers,
Berger, P. L.(2005). “Orthodoxy and Global Pluralism”, Demokratizatsiya ., Vol. 13 Issue 3, 437-447. 11p.
Berger, P. L.(2008). “Secularization Falsified”, First Thing, , 23- 27
Berger, P. L., Banchoff, T. (ed), (2007) “Pluralism, Protestanization and The Voluntary Principle”, Democracy and The New
Religious Pluralism içinde, London, Oxford University Press, 19- 30
Davie, G. (2006) Modern Avrupada Din, Akif Demirci (çev.),İstanbul: Küre Yayınları
Durkheim, E. (2006). Toplumsal İşbölümü, Özer Ozankaya (çev), İstanbul, Cem Yayınları,
Günay, E. (1998). Gabriel le Bras’a Göre Din Sosyolojisinin Araştırma Alanları ve Yöntemleri, Erciyes Sosyal BilimlerEnstitüsü
Dergisi, Sayı: 2, 10-28
Hervieu-Léger, D. Woodhead, L. Heelas, P. ve Martin, D., (ed), (2001). “The Twofold Limit of The Nation of Secularization”,
Peter Berger and The Study of Religion, London: Routledge.
Mills, C. W. (2007). Toplumbilimsel Düşün, Ünsal Oskay (çev), İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
Sartre, J.P. (2009). Varlık ve Hiçlik, Turhan Ilgaz (çev), İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları
Weber, M. (1973). “On Sect, Church and Mysticism”, Sociological Analysis, Cilt:34, No:2, 140-149
