Strong Programme against Scientific Knowledge and Its Autonomy
Abstract views: 25
/ 
PDF downloads: 9
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7419836Keywords:
Strong Programme, notion of interest, autonomy of scientific knowledge, social factorsAbstract
Science and scientific knowledge have been questioned in many ways for a long period of time. Especially, after the scientific revolution of 16th- and 17th-century Europe1 , science and its knowledge have been mainly accepted one of the most valuable and trustable information. However, in 20th century, autonomy of scientific knowledge and its dominant position over other kinds of knowledge have been mainly criticised. Social and other factors that were tried to be excluded before have been incorporated into the work by the influence of the Strong Programme. In this article, it will be argued that while people are presenting scientific knowledge, their interests, beliefs and the communities they are involved in are also shown to be effective in producing this information. Thus, the desired result is that it is not reasonable to talk about the absolute autonomy of scientific knowledge.
References
Barnes, B. (1985). About Science. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barnes, B. (1995). The Elements of Social Theory. London: UCL Press.
Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chalmers, A. (1999) What is This Thing Called Science? An Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and Its Method.
Berkshire(UK): Open University.
Haré, R. and Krausz, M. (1998). Varieties of Relativism. The Journal of Value Inquiry. Netherlands.
Hendrix, S. E. (2011). "Natural Philosophy or Science in Premodern Epistemic Regimes? The Case of the Astrology of Albert the
Great and Galileo Galilei". Teorie vědy / Theory of Science. 33 (1): 111–132.
Jasanoff, S. Markle, G. Pinch T. and Petersen, J. (2002). Handbook of Science, Technology and Society. Rev Ed.. London: Sage.
Pigliucci, M. (2008) “The Borderlands between Science and Philosophy: An Introduction”. Chicago Journals. vol. 83. No. 1.
March. pp. 7-15
Sokal, A. and Bricmont, J. (2002). Son Moda Saçmalar Postmodern Aydınların Bilimi Kötüye Kullanmaları. Çev. M. Baydur ve O.
Onaran. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Uebel, T. (2012), "Vienna Circle". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/vienna-circle/
Webster, A. (1991). Science, Technology and Society New Directions. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
